Advantages and Challenges of Using Interactive Methods in Teaching Speaking to Non-Philological Students
Risqimova Gulnoza Ibrohim qizi
University of Exact and Social Sciences
Akbarova Shaxnoza Xikmatullayevna
Scientific advisor
Keywords: interactive methods, speaking skills, non-philological students, communicative competence, ESP, student-centered learning, challenges in language teaching, Uzbekistan higher education.
Abstract
Interactive methods play a crucial role in developing speaking skills among non-philological (non-language major) students, who often face limited exposure to English and traditional grammar-focused instruction. These methods—such as role-plays, group discussions, debates, pair work, information-gap activities, simulations, and technology-enhanced tasks—shift the focus from teacher-centered lectures to student-centered communication, fostering fluency, confidence, motivation, and real-life language application. Advantages include increased student engagement, improved communicative competence, development of critical thinking and teamwork skills, and better retention through active participation. However, challenges encompass uneven student participation, large class sizes, varying proficiency levels, teacher training needs, time constraints, and resource limitations. This study examines these aspects through literature review, pedagogical analysis, and practical examples, particularly in the Uzbek higher education context. Findings suggest that while interactive approaches significantly enhance speaking outcomes for ESP (English for Specific Purposes) learners in fields like engineering, economics, and medicine, their successful implementation requires careful planning, teacher professional development, and adaptation to local conditions.
References
1. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Cited for CLT principles].
2. Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman. [Advantages of interactive activities].
3. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education.
4. Jalolov, J.J., Makhkamova, G.T., & Ashurov, Sh.S. (2015). English Language Teaching Methodology (Theory and Practice). Tashkent: Fan va texnologiya. pp. 200-300 (approx., sections on communicative skills and interactive learning). [Uzbek methodological foundation].
5. Risqimova, G., & Mannonova, S. (2025). Enhancing speaking skills in Non-filology University Students through interactive methods. Journal of Science-Innovative Research in Uzbekistan, 3(4), 366-370. [Direct study on the topic].
6. Abdukhafizova, N. (2022). Interactive Methods of Teaching English in a Non-Philological Educational Institution. European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education. [Practical techniques].
7. Mamadjanov, A. V. (2022). Interactive Methods and Technologies of Teaching English in Non-Linguistic Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Philosophical Studies and Social Sciences, 2(2), 99–106. [Uzbek context].