KARL POPPЕR IJODIDA ILMIY BAHS TUSHUNCHASI VA RATSIONAL ARGUMЕNTLASH MODЕLI
Sherboboyev Muxriddin Azimmurod o‘g‘li
Alfraganus universiteti Ijtimoiy fanlar kafedrasi dotsenti, PhD
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9299-1475
Keywords: Kalit so’zlar: Karl Popper, bilish, bahs, argumentlash, falsifikatsiya, demorkatsiya, tanqidiy ratsionalizm, ilmiy bilish.
Abstract
Annatatsiya: Mazkur maqola Popperning ilmiy bahs tushunchasi va tanqidiy ratsionalizm asosidagi argumentlash modelini konstruktiv tahlil qilindi. Bahsning normativ qoidalari, bahsiy raqobat va kooperatsiyaning ilmiy taraqqiyotdagi roli, shuningdek, zamonaviy argumentatsiya nazariyalari (pragma-dialektik, informal mantiq yondashuvlari) bilan Popper konsepsiyasi o‘rtasidagi o‘xshash va farqli jihatlarni muhokama qilindi.
References
1) Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 2002. pp. 27–48; 86–105.
2) Popper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2002. pp. 33–65.
3) Shearmur, Jeremy; Stokes, Geoffrey (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. pp. 1–23; 145–170.
4) Rowbottom, Darrell P. Popper’s Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation. London/New York: Routledge, 2011. pp. 15–40.
5) van Eemeren, Frans H.; Grootendorst, Rob. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. 1–30.
(Rus tilidagi manbalar)
6) Поппер, Карл. Логика научного исследования. Москва: Республика, 2005. с. 41–80; 97–120.
7) Ильин, В. В. Философия науки. Москва: Издательство Юрайт, 2019. с. 220–242.
8) Лекторский, В. А. Рациональность и ценности. Москва: Прогресс-Традиция, 2011. с. 75–102.
(O‘zbek tilidagi manbalar)
9) Nazarov, Q. (mas’ul muharrir). Falsafa: Darslik. Toshkent: Yangi asr avlodi, 2011. bet 312–330.
10) Yo‘ldoshev, M.; Muxtorov, A. Ilmiy tadqiqot metodologiyasi. Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya, 2015. bet 45–78.
