GREAT POWER RIVALRY FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF REALISM AND LIBERALISM
Xudoyberdiyev Otabek Zafar o'g'li
International Islamic Academy of Uzbekistan
Keywords: Great power rivalry, realism, liberalism, international relations theory, U.S.–China competition, NATO–Russia relations, global politics, balance of power, international cooperation.
Abstract
This article analyzes the phenomenon of great power rivalry through the lenses of two dominant theories in international relations: realism and liberalism. It compares how each theory explains the causes, dynamics, and consequences of competition among powerful states. While realism emphasizes power politics, national interests, and the inevitability of conflict in an anarchic international system, liberalism highlights the role of international institutions, economic interdependence, and democratic values in mitigating rivalry. By applying both theoretical frameworks to contemporary examples—such as U.S.–China relations and NATO–Russia tensions—the paper aims to provide a balanced understanding of how theoretical paradigms shape the interpretation of global strategic competition.
References
1. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.
2. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
4. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.
5. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
6. Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.
7. Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
8. Nye, J. S., & Keohane, R. O. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown and Company.
