CLINICAL RESEARCH IN FORENSIC MEDICINE: CURRENT INNOVATIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES.

Nuriddinov Azimjon Kamolitdin ogli

Tashkent State Medical University Assistant.

ABDIKARIMOV BAKHODIR ABDIKHASHIMOVICH

Deputy Director of the Republican Scientific and Practical Center of Forensic Medical Examination for Cooperation with Regional Branches. (Tashkent, Uzbekistan)

Nilufar Khamraevna Ganieva

Tashkent State Medical University Senior Lecturer.

Keywords: Kalit so‘zlar: sud-tibbiyot; klinik tadqiqotlar; innovatsiyalar; muammolar; DNK tahlili; sud-tibbiy biomarkerlar; o‘limdan keyingi tasvirlash; sun’iy intellekt; axloqiy masalalar; standartlashtirish.

---

Abstract

Sud-tibbiyotida klinik tadqiqotlar diagnostik, analitik va tekshiruv usullarini Sud-tibbiy, yuridik amaliyotga joriy etishdan oldin ularning ishonchliligi va samaradorligini tasdiqlashda muhim ahamiyatga ega. Zamonaviy innovatsiyalar — molekulyar-genetik texnologiyalar, sud-tibbiy biomarkerlar, o‘limdan keyingi tasvirlash (postmortem vizualizatsiya) va sun’iy intellekt — sud-tibbiy tadqiqotlarning aniqligi, tezligi va imkoniyatlarini sezilarli darajada oshirdi. Ushbu yutuqlar shaxsni aniqlash, o‘lim sababini va jarohatlarning hayot davomida olinganligini aniqroq belgilash, shuningdek jinoyat voqealarini rekonstruksiya qilish imkonini beradi. Biroq, inson va o‘limdan keyingi materiallar bilan ishlashdagi axloqiy cheklovlar, turli yurisdiksiyalarda standartlashtirilgan protokollarning yo‘qligi, kichik namunalar hajmi va sudda usullarni qabul qilish mezonlaridagi farqlar kabi jiddiy muammolar saqlanib qolmoqda. Ushbu muammolarni hal etish uchun fanlararo hamkorlik, metodologiyalarni uyg‘unlashtirish va xalqaro me’yoriy standartlarni mustahkamlash zarur. Ilmiy asoslangan validatsiya va qat’iy axloqiy nazorat bilan ilg‘or texnologiyalarni integratsiya qilish sud-tibbiy dalillarning sud jarayonlarida ishonchliligi va haqqoniyligini ta’minlaydi.

---

References

1. Books

1. Butler JM. Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. ISBN: 978-0-12-374513-2.

2. Houck MM. Forensic Science: Modern Methods of Solving Crime. Santa Barbara (CA): Praeger; 2017. ISBN: 978-1-4408-4278-3.

2. Magazine Articles

1. Black S, Lee S, Hainsworth S. The use of artificial intelligence in forensic pathology. Forensic Sci Int Digit Investig. 2021;39:301289. doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301289.

2. Caplan A. Ethical issues in forensic genetics. J Law Biosci. 2019;6(1):1–6.

3. Cattaneo C, Domeneghini C, Di Martino S, et al. Histological criteria for wound vitality: state of the art. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;193(1–3):10–15.

4. Cattaneo C, Viero A, Di Martino S, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of vitality markers in human skin wounds. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123(3):207–214.

5. Christe A, Zollinger U, Thali MJ, et al. Post-mortem MRI and CT findings in drowning victims. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;195(1–3):85–90.

6. Horsman-Hall KM, Krane DE, Bajic D, et al. Considerations for validation studies in forensic science. Forensic Sci Policy Manag. 2014;5(1–2):3–15.

7. Imwinkelried EJ. The standard for admissibility of scientific evidence: The Daubert trilogy. Am J Trial Advoc. 2016;39(2):149–72.

8. Madea B. Methods for determining time of death. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016;12(4):451–85.

9. Maiese A, Boccia S, Malovini A, et al. MicroRNAs in forensic medicine: A review. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019;36:29–35.

10. Mangin P, Castella V, Taroni F. Small sample sizes in forensic validation studies: implications for admissibility. J Forensic Sci. 2019;64(2):447–53.

11. Parson W, Dür A, Egger M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;34:1–8.

12. Payne-James J, Byard RW, Corey TS, Henderson C, editors. Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2016.

13. Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Peebles C, et al. Post-mortem imaging as an adjunct to autopsy: PMCT versus conventional autopsy. Histopathology. 2012;60(6):1157–73.

14. Roux C, Beaudoin A, Thirion-Delalande C, et al. The emergence of AI in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020;2:17–27.

15. Rutty GN, Morgan B, Robinson C, et al. The role of post-mortem imaging in forensic pathology: a review of the literature. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013;9:501–15. doi:10.1007/s12024-013-9461-z.

16. Rutty GN, Morgan B, Robinson C, et al. The role of computed tomography in determining the cause of death. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013;9(4):482–93. doi:10.1007/s12024-013-9466-7.

17. Saks MJ, Faigman DL. Expert evidence after Daubert. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2008;4:105–30. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172309.

18. Vidaki A, Kayser M. Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;37:180–95. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.008.