PDF
Published
2026-01-19
Section
Articles
How to Cite
SUN’IY INTELLEKT YORDAMIDA KASR TARTIBLI HOSILALARNING VIZUALIZATSIYASI VA TALABALARNING TUSHUNISH DARAJASINI OSHIRISH
Sobirboyeva Gulrux Javlon qizi
Urganch davlat pedagogika instituti magistranti
Keywords: kasr tartibli hosilalar, sun’iy intellekt texnologiyalari, matematik vizualizatsiya, integrativ ta’lim yondashuvi, fanlararo integratsiya, chuqurlashtirilgan matematika ta’limi, raqamli ta’lim vositalari.
Abstract
Mazkur maqolada matematika fanini chuqurlashtirib o‘qitish jarayonida kasr tartibli hosilalarni o‘rganishda sun’iy intellekt vositalaridan foydalanishga asoslangan integrativ yondashuvning samaradorligi tahlil qilinadi. Kasr tartibli hosilalar murakkab va abstrakt matematik tushuncha bo‘lib, ularni an’anaviy usullarda o‘qitish talabalarda yetarli darajada tushunishni ta’minlamaydi. Shu bois tadqiqotda vizualizatsiya va fanlararo integratsiya imkoniyatlaridan foydalangan holda sun’iy intellektga asoslangan o‘qitish modeli taklif etiladi.
Tadqiqot natijalari sun’iy intellekt vositalaridan foydalanish talabalarning nazariy bilimlarini chuqurlashtirish, mantiqiy fikrlashini rivojlantirish hamda kasr tartibli hosilalar bo‘yicha amaliy ko‘nikmalarini shakllantirishda samarali ekanligini ko‘rsatdi. Olingan xulosalar kasr tartibli hosilalarni o‘qitish metodikasini takomillashtirishda amaliy ahamiyatga ega.
References
1. Fractional Differential Equations. Podlubny I. Fractional Differential Equations. — San Diego: Academic Press, 2006.
2. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Kilbas A.A., Srivastava H.M., Trujillo J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. — Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006.
3. Fractional Calculus. Oldham K.B., Spanier J. The Fractional Calculus. — New York: Academic Press, 1974.
4. Samko S.G., Kilbas A.A., Marichev O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. — New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1993.
5. Diethelm K. The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations. — Berlin: Springer, 2010.
6. Tall D., Vinner S. Concept image and concept definition in mathematics // Educational Studies in Mathematics. — 1981. — Vol. 12. — P. 151–169.
7. Arcavi A. The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics // Educational Studies in Mathematics. — 2003. — Vol. 52. — P. 215–241.
8. Hohenwarter M., Fuchs K. Combination of dynamic geometry, algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra // Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching. — 2004. — P. 1–6.
9. Zbiek R.M., Heid M.K., Blume G.W., Dick T.P. Research on technology in mathematics education // Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. — 2007. — P. 1169–1207.
10. Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. — Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.
11. Luckin R., Holmes W., Griffiths M., Forcier L.B. Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. — London: Pearson, 2016.
12. Woolf B.P. Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors. — San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2009.
13. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge // Teachers College Record. — 2006. — Vol. 108(6). — P. 1017–1054.
14. Bybee R.W. STEM Education: Innovation and Reform. — Arlington: NSTA Press, 2013.
and calculus in the software system GeoGebra // Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching. — 2004. — P. 1–6.
9. Zbiek R.M., Heid M.K., Blume G.W., Dick T.P. Research on technology in mathematics education // Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. — 2007. — P. 1169–1207.
10. Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. — Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.
11. Luckin R., Holmes W., Griffiths M., Forcier L.B. Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. — London: Pearson, 2016.
12. Woolf B.P. Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors. — San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2009.
13. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge // Teachers College Record. — 2006. — Vol. 108(6). — P. 1017–1054.
14. Bybee R.W. STEM Education: Innovation and Reform. — Arlington: NSTA Press, 2013.
15. Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy R., Baki M. The effectiveness of online and blended learning // Teachers College Record. — 2013. — Vol. 115(3). — P. 1–47.
